The entire firm, attorneys and administrative staff, is committed to delivering the utmost quality for our clients.
Although we are a small firm, we have the infrastructure in place to handle a large volume of work.
By ensuring the quality of the patent applications upon filing, we have significantly shortened their pendency.
How? Through examiner interviews and effective client communications.
US 11,170,857 “Semiconductor memory device that performs successive tracking reads during an operation to read one page”
US 11,169,843 “Virtualization of multiple coprocessors
US 11,167,780 “Mobile body and terminal case to be attached to the same ”
Sisvel Int’l S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc./Netflix, Inc. v. DivX, LLC (AIPPI 2023 Vol.68 No.10)
In re Float’N’Grill LLC/Trinity Info Media, LLC v. Covalent, Inc. (AIPPI 2023 Vol.68 No.9)
Medtronic v. Teleflex Innovations/Parus Holdings v. Google (AIPPI 2023 Vol.68 No.8)
[October 26, 2023] IP Seminar in Tokyo “Important five CAFC decisions useful in U.S. patent prosecution and not so often explained in Japanese”
[June 2023] Participation in Patent Prosecution & Portfolio Management Masters™ 2023